Page 167 - Karmen Pižorn, Alja Lipavic Oštir in Janja Žmavc, ur. • Obrazi več-/raznojezičnosti. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut, 2022. Digitalna knjižnica, Dissertationes 44
P. 167
matematika v soft clil pristopu v gimnaziji
Bowler, B. (2007). The Rise and Rise of CLIL. New Standpoints, Sep-Oct 2007:
7–9.
Buckley F. (2000). Team-teaching: What, why and how? Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Canado, M. L. P. (2019). CLIL and elitism: myth or reality? The Language Lear-
ning Journal, 48(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1645872
Caraker, R. (2018). CLIL and Teacher Cognition in Japanese Secondary Scho-
ols. 研究紀要, (96), 1–16. https://www.chs.nihon-u.ac.jp/institute/human/
kiyou/96/1.pdf
Chouinard, R., & Roy, N. (2008). Changes in high‐school students‘ com-
petence beliefs, utility value and achievement goals in mathemati-
cs. British journal of educational psychology, 78(1), 31–50. https://doi.
org/10.1348/000709907X197993
Cimermanová, I. (2017). CLIL–a Dialogue between the Language and Subject
Teachers. Scientia et eruditio, 1(1), 1–14.
Cohen, J. (2018). Practices that cross disciplines?: Revisiting explicit instructi-
on in elementary mathematics and English language arts. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 69, 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.021
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Con-
nected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies. The International Jou-
rnal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.
org/10.2167/beb459.0
Coyle, D., Hood, P. in Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integra-
ted Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Frigols, M.J., Marsh, D., Mehisto, P. in Wolff, D. (2011). European Framework
for CLIL Teacher Education. Graz: The European Centre for Modern Lan-
guages.
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st Century. Hoboken, NJ: Wi-
ley Blackwell.
Ikeda, M. (2013). Does CLIL work for Japanese secondary school students? Po-
tential for the »Weak« version of CLIL. International CLIL Research Jou-
rnal, 2(1), 31–44.
Jäppinen, A. K. (2005). Thinking and content learning of mathematics and sci-
ence as cognitional development content and language integrated lear-
ning (CLIL): Teaching through a foreign language in Finland. Language
and Education, 19 (2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780508668671
167
Bowler, B. (2007). The Rise and Rise of CLIL. New Standpoints, Sep-Oct 2007:
7–9.
Buckley F. (2000). Team-teaching: What, why and how? Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Canado, M. L. P. (2019). CLIL and elitism: myth or reality? The Language Lear-
ning Journal, 48(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1645872
Caraker, R. (2018). CLIL and Teacher Cognition in Japanese Secondary Scho-
ols. 研究紀要, (96), 1–16. https://www.chs.nihon-u.ac.jp/institute/human/
kiyou/96/1.pdf
Chouinard, R., & Roy, N. (2008). Changes in high‐school students‘ com-
petence beliefs, utility value and achievement goals in mathemati-
cs. British journal of educational psychology, 78(1), 31–50. https://doi.
org/10.1348/000709907X197993
Cimermanová, I. (2017). CLIL–a Dialogue between the Language and Subject
Teachers. Scientia et eruditio, 1(1), 1–14.
Cohen, J. (2018). Practices that cross disciplines?: Revisiting explicit instructi-
on in elementary mathematics and English language arts. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 69, 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.021
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Con-
nected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies. The International Jou-
rnal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.
org/10.2167/beb459.0
Coyle, D., Hood, P. in Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integra-
ted Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Frigols, M.J., Marsh, D., Mehisto, P. in Wolff, D. (2011). European Framework
for CLIL Teacher Education. Graz: The European Centre for Modern Lan-
guages.
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st Century. Hoboken, NJ: Wi-
ley Blackwell.
Ikeda, M. (2013). Does CLIL work for Japanese secondary school students? Po-
tential for the »Weak« version of CLIL. International CLIL Research Jou-
rnal, 2(1), 31–44.
Jäppinen, A. K. (2005). Thinking and content learning of mathematics and sci-
ence as cognitional development content and language integrated lear-
ning (CLIL): Teaching through a foreign language in Finland. Language
and Education, 19 (2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780508668671
167
