Page 156 - Eva Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Plamen V. Mirazchiyski. 2020. Bralna pismenost četrtošolcev in četrtošolk v Sloveniji: nacionalno poročilo Mednarodne raziskave bralne pismenosti (IEA PIRLS 2016 in ePIRLS 2016). Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut. Digitalna knjižnica, Documenta 15
P. 156
M. O. Martin, str. 11–29. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch
School of Education, Boston College, International Association for the Eva-
luation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Murnane, R., I. Sawhill, in C. Snow. 2012. »Literacy challenges for the twenty-first
century: Introducing the issue.« The Future of Children 22(2): 3–15.
Murphy, P., I. Wilkinson, A. Soter, M. Hennessey, in J. Alexander. 2009. »Exami-
ning the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of
text: A meta-analysis.« Journal of Educational Psychology 101(3): 740–764.
Nacionalna strategija za razvoj bralne pismenosti (predlog, 5. 4. 2017). Ljublja-
na: MIZŠ. Dostopno prek: MIZS_Bralna_Pismenost_javna_razprava_
april_2017.pdf (3. 11. 2018).
Palincsar, A., in N. Duke. 2004. »The role of text and text-reader interactions in
young children’s reading development and achievement.« The Elementary
School Journal 105(2): 183–197.
Perfetti, C. 2007. »Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension.« Scientific
Studies of Reading 11(4): 357–383.
156 Perfetti, C., in S. Adolf. 2012. »Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework
from word meaning to text meaning.« V Measuring up: Advances in how
to assess reading ability, ur. J. Sabatini, E. Albro in T. O’Reilly. Lanham, MD:
Rowman in Littlefield.
Pew Research Center. 2012. How teens do research in the digital world. Washing-
ton, DC: Author.
Pew Research Center. 2013a. Teens and technology. Washington, DC: Author.
Pew Research Center. 2013b. How teachers are using technology at home and in
the classrooms. Washington, DC: Author.
Pressley, M., in I. Gaskins. 2006. »Metacognitively competent reading compre-
hension is constructively responsive reading: How can such reading be de-
veloped in students?« Metacognition Learning 1(1): 99–113.
Raikes, H., B. A. Pan, G. Luze, C. S. TamisLeMonda, J. Brooks-Gunn, J. Constan-
tine, L. B. Tarullo, H. A. Raikes, in E. T. Rodriguez. 2006. »Mother– child bo-
okreading in low-income families: Correlates and outcomes during the
first three years of life.« Child Development 77(4): 924–953.
Rapp, D., in P. van den Broek. 2005. »Dynamic text comprehension: An inte-
grative view of reading.« Current Directions in Psychological Science 14(5):
276–279.
Reuda, R. 2013. »21st-century skills: Cultural, linguistic, and motivational per-
spectives.« V Theoretical models and processes of reading, sixth edition, ur.
D. Alvermann, N. Unrau in R. Ruddell, 1241–1268. Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
bralna pismenost četrtošolcev in četrtošolk v sloveniji
School of Education, Boston College, International Association for the Eva-
luation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Murnane, R., I. Sawhill, in C. Snow. 2012. »Literacy challenges for the twenty-first
century: Introducing the issue.« The Future of Children 22(2): 3–15.
Murphy, P., I. Wilkinson, A. Soter, M. Hennessey, in J. Alexander. 2009. »Exami-
ning the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of
text: A meta-analysis.« Journal of Educational Psychology 101(3): 740–764.
Nacionalna strategija za razvoj bralne pismenosti (predlog, 5. 4. 2017). Ljublja-
na: MIZŠ. Dostopno prek: MIZS_Bralna_Pismenost_javna_razprava_
april_2017.pdf (3. 11. 2018).
Palincsar, A., in N. Duke. 2004. »The role of text and text-reader interactions in
young children’s reading development and achievement.« The Elementary
School Journal 105(2): 183–197.
Perfetti, C. 2007. »Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension.« Scientific
Studies of Reading 11(4): 357–383.
156 Perfetti, C., in S. Adolf. 2012. »Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework
from word meaning to text meaning.« V Measuring up: Advances in how
to assess reading ability, ur. J. Sabatini, E. Albro in T. O’Reilly. Lanham, MD:
Rowman in Littlefield.
Pew Research Center. 2012. How teens do research in the digital world. Washing-
ton, DC: Author.
Pew Research Center. 2013a. Teens and technology. Washington, DC: Author.
Pew Research Center. 2013b. How teachers are using technology at home and in
the classrooms. Washington, DC: Author.
Pressley, M., in I. Gaskins. 2006. »Metacognitively competent reading compre-
hension is constructively responsive reading: How can such reading be de-
veloped in students?« Metacognition Learning 1(1): 99–113.
Raikes, H., B. A. Pan, G. Luze, C. S. TamisLeMonda, J. Brooks-Gunn, J. Constan-
tine, L. B. Tarullo, H. A. Raikes, in E. T. Rodriguez. 2006. »Mother– child bo-
okreading in low-income families: Correlates and outcomes during the
first three years of life.« Child Development 77(4): 924–953.
Rapp, D., in P. van den Broek. 2005. »Dynamic text comprehension: An inte-
grative view of reading.« Current Directions in Psychological Science 14(5):
276–279.
Reuda, R. 2013. »21st-century skills: Cultural, linguistic, and motivational per-
spectives.« V Theoretical models and processes of reading, sixth edition, ur.
D. Alvermann, N. Unrau in R. Ruddell, 1241–1268. Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
bralna pismenost četrtošolcev in četrtošolk v sloveniji
