Page 299 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 299
debate as an educational tool:
is polarization a debate side effect? 299
Tannen, D. (2000). Agonism in the Academy. The Chronicle of Higher
Education, 46/30, B7–8.
Tannen, D. (2002). Agonism in Academic Discourse. Journal of Prag-
matics, 34/10, 1651–1669.
Thomas, D. A., and J. Hart (1983). Ethics in Speech Events: A Replica-
tion and Extension. The National Forensic Journal, 1/2, 74–95.
Tindale, C. W. (2007). Fallacies and Argument Appraisal, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Tjosvold, D., and D. W. Johnson (1977). Effects of Controversy on Cog-
nitive Perspective Taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69/6,
679–685.
Tjosvold, D., D. W. Johnson, and J. F. Lawrence (1980). Effects of Con-
troversy and Defensiveness on Cognitive Perspective-Taking. Psy-
chological Reports, 47, 1043–1053.
Trapp, R., J. P. Zompetti, J. Motiejunaite, and W. Driscoll (2005). Dis-
covering the World Trough Debate. A Practical Guide to Educational
Debate for Debaters, Coaches and Judges, New York: IDEA.
Tumposky, N. R. (2004). The Debate Debate. The Clearing House, 78/2,
52–55.
Turchi, G. P., D. Barbanera, and C. Monaco (2008). Valutazione de-
ll’efficacia del percorso formativo. Nicolli, S., and A. Cattani (eds.).
Palestra di Botta e Risposta. La disputa filosofica come formazione al
dibattito nella scuola. Padova: CLEUP, 85–92.
Turner, M. M., S. Yao, R. Baker, J. Goodman, and S. A. Matarese (2010).
Do Lay People Prepare Both Sides of an Argument? The Effects of
Confidence, Forewarning, and Expected Interaction on Seeking
out Counter-Attitudinal Information. Argumentation and Advoca-
cy, 46/4, 226–239.
Ulrich, W. (1986a). Judging Academic Debate, Lincolnwood: National
Textbook Company.
Ulrich, W. (1986b). The Ethical Obligations of the Forensic Educator.
Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 7, 76–88.
Vo, H. X., and R. L. Morris (1996). Debate as a Tool in Teaching Eco-
nomics: Rationale, Technique, and Some Evidence. Journal of Edu-
cation for Business, 81/6, 315–320.
Walton, D. (1992). Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation, Alba-
ny: State University of New York Press.
Walton, D. (1995). A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, London: The Univer-
sity of Alabama Press.
is polarization a debate side effect? 299
Tannen, D. (2000). Agonism in the Academy. The Chronicle of Higher
Education, 46/30, B7–8.
Tannen, D. (2002). Agonism in Academic Discourse. Journal of Prag-
matics, 34/10, 1651–1669.
Thomas, D. A., and J. Hart (1983). Ethics in Speech Events: A Replica-
tion and Extension. The National Forensic Journal, 1/2, 74–95.
Tindale, C. W. (2007). Fallacies and Argument Appraisal, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Tjosvold, D., and D. W. Johnson (1977). Effects of Controversy on Cog-
nitive Perspective Taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69/6,
679–685.
Tjosvold, D., D. W. Johnson, and J. F. Lawrence (1980). Effects of Con-
troversy and Defensiveness on Cognitive Perspective-Taking. Psy-
chological Reports, 47, 1043–1053.
Trapp, R., J. P. Zompetti, J. Motiejunaite, and W. Driscoll (2005). Dis-
covering the World Trough Debate. A Practical Guide to Educational
Debate for Debaters, Coaches and Judges, New York: IDEA.
Tumposky, N. R. (2004). The Debate Debate. The Clearing House, 78/2,
52–55.
Turchi, G. P., D. Barbanera, and C. Monaco (2008). Valutazione de-
ll’efficacia del percorso formativo. Nicolli, S., and A. Cattani (eds.).
Palestra di Botta e Risposta. La disputa filosofica come formazione al
dibattito nella scuola. Padova: CLEUP, 85–92.
Turner, M. M., S. Yao, R. Baker, J. Goodman, and S. A. Matarese (2010).
Do Lay People Prepare Both Sides of an Argument? The Effects of
Confidence, Forewarning, and Expected Interaction on Seeking
out Counter-Attitudinal Information. Argumentation and Advoca-
cy, 46/4, 226–239.
Ulrich, W. (1986a). Judging Academic Debate, Lincolnwood: National
Textbook Company.
Ulrich, W. (1986b). The Ethical Obligations of the Forensic Educator.
Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 7, 76–88.
Vo, H. X., and R. L. Morris (1996). Debate as a Tool in Teaching Eco-
nomics: Rationale, Technique, and Some Evidence. Journal of Edu-
cation for Business, 81/6, 315–320.
Walton, D. (1992). Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation, Alba-
ny: State University of New York Press.
Walton, D. (1995). A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, London: The Univer-
sity of Alabama Press.
