Page 300 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 300
What Do We Know about the World?
Walton, D. (1996). Arguments from Ignorance, University Park: The
Pennsylvania State University Press.
Walton, D. (1998). The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argu-
ment, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation, New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D. (2007). Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation, Philadel-
phia: Jon Benjamins Publishing.
Walton, D. (2008). Informal Logic. A Pragmatic Approach, New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Westbrook, B. E. (2002). Debating Both Sides: What Nineteenth-Cen-
tury College Literary Societies Can Teach Us about Critical Peda-
gogies. Rhetoric Review, 21/4, 339–356.
Willard, C. A. (1988). A Theory of Argumentation, Tuscaloosa: Univer-
sity of Alabama Press.
Williams, P. H. (2010). Using Debates on Family Issues with Under-
graduate Students: The 5 R’s Strategy for Promoting Skill Develop-
ment and Attitude Change. Michigan Family Review, 14/1, 91–109.
Williams, D. E., B. R. McGee, and D. S. Worth. University Student
Perceptions of the Efficacy of Debate Participation: An Empirical
Investigation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 37/4, 198–209.
Wood, R. V., and L. Goodnight (1994). Strategic Debate, Lincolnwood:
NTC.
Wood, S., and P. A. Rowland-Morin (1989). Motivational Tension:
Winning vs. Pedagogy in Academic Debate. The National Foren-
sic Journal, 7/2, 81–97.
Walton, D. (1996). Arguments from Ignorance, University Park: The
Pennsylvania State University Press.
Walton, D. (1998). The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argu-
ment, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation, New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D. (2007). Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation, Philadel-
phia: Jon Benjamins Publishing.
Walton, D. (2008). Informal Logic. A Pragmatic Approach, New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Westbrook, B. E. (2002). Debating Both Sides: What Nineteenth-Cen-
tury College Literary Societies Can Teach Us about Critical Peda-
gogies. Rhetoric Review, 21/4, 339–356.
Willard, C. A. (1988). A Theory of Argumentation, Tuscaloosa: Univer-
sity of Alabama Press.
Williams, P. H. (2010). Using Debates on Family Issues with Under-
graduate Students: The 5 R’s Strategy for Promoting Skill Develop-
ment and Attitude Change. Michigan Family Review, 14/1, 91–109.
Williams, D. E., B. R. McGee, and D. S. Worth. University Student
Perceptions of the Efficacy of Debate Participation: An Empirical
Investigation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 37/4, 198–209.
Wood, R. V., and L. Goodnight (1994). Strategic Debate, Lincolnwood:
NTC.
Wood, S., and P. A. Rowland-Morin (1989). Motivational Tension:
Winning vs. Pedagogy in Academic Debate. The National Foren-
sic Journal, 7/2, 81–97.