Page 294 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 294
What Do We Know about the World?
Fogelin, R. J., and W. Sinott-Armstrong (1997). Understanding Argu-
ments. An Introduction to Informal Logic, Troy: Harcourt Brace
College Publishers.
Foster, D. E. (2004). In Defense of the Argument Culture: A Response
to Recent Criticism Against the Use of Adversarial Debate as a
Method of Societal Decision-Making. The Forensic of Phi Kappa
Delta, 89, 13–29.
Freely, A. J. (1961). Argumentation and Debate. Rational Decision Mak-
ing. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Friedley, S. A. (1983). Ethics and Evidence Usage: Current “Codes” in
Individual Events. The National Forensic Journal, 1/2, 109–117.
Fuentes, B. C., and Y. C. Santibáñez (2011). Desegñando debates: pre-
liminares para un enfoque dialógico y crítico. Cattani, A. (ed.). Ar-
gomentare le proprie ragioni. Organizzare, condurre e valutare un di-
battito. Casoria: Loffredo University Press, 111–137.
Glasl, F. (1997). Confronting Conflict. A First-Aid Kit for Handling Con-
flict, Gloucestershire: Hawthorn Press.
Glasl, F. (1982). The Process of Conflict Escalation and Roles of Third
Parties. Bomers, G. B. J., and R. B. Peterson (eds.). Conflict Man-
agement and Industrial Relations. The Hague: Kluwer Nijhoff Pub-
lishing, 119–140.
Green, C. S., and H. G. Klug (1990). Teaching Critical Thinking and
Writing Through Debates: An Experimental Evaluation. Teaching
Sociology, 18/4, 462–471.
Greenstreet, R. (1993). Academic Debate and Critical Thinking: A
Look at the Evidence.” National Forensic Journal, 11/1, 13–28.
Groarke, L. A., and C. W. Tindale. Good Reasoning Matters! A Con-
structive Approach to Critical Thinking, Canada: Oxford Universi-
ty Press.
Hensley, D., and D. Carlin (1994). Mastering Competitive Debate, 4th
Edition, Kansas: Carl Publishing.
Hill, B. (1993). The Value of Competitive Debate as a Vehicle for Pro-
moting Development of Critical Thiking Ability. CEDA Yearbook,
14, 1–23.
Hinck, E. A. (2003). Managing the Dialectical Tension between Com-
petition and Education in Forensics: A Response to Burnett, Brand,
& Meister. The National Forensic Journal, 21/2, 60–76.
Huber, R. B., and C. A. Snider (2005). Influencing through Argument,
New York: IDEA.
Fogelin, R. J., and W. Sinott-Armstrong (1997). Understanding Argu-
ments. An Introduction to Informal Logic, Troy: Harcourt Brace
College Publishers.
Foster, D. E. (2004). In Defense of the Argument Culture: A Response
to Recent Criticism Against the Use of Adversarial Debate as a
Method of Societal Decision-Making. The Forensic of Phi Kappa
Delta, 89, 13–29.
Freely, A. J. (1961). Argumentation and Debate. Rational Decision Mak-
ing. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Friedley, S. A. (1983). Ethics and Evidence Usage: Current “Codes” in
Individual Events. The National Forensic Journal, 1/2, 109–117.
Fuentes, B. C., and Y. C. Santibáñez (2011). Desegñando debates: pre-
liminares para un enfoque dialógico y crítico. Cattani, A. (ed.). Ar-
gomentare le proprie ragioni. Organizzare, condurre e valutare un di-
battito. Casoria: Loffredo University Press, 111–137.
Glasl, F. (1997). Confronting Conflict. A First-Aid Kit for Handling Con-
flict, Gloucestershire: Hawthorn Press.
Glasl, F. (1982). The Process of Conflict Escalation and Roles of Third
Parties. Bomers, G. B. J., and R. B. Peterson (eds.). Conflict Man-
agement and Industrial Relations. The Hague: Kluwer Nijhoff Pub-
lishing, 119–140.
Green, C. S., and H. G. Klug (1990). Teaching Critical Thinking and
Writing Through Debates: An Experimental Evaluation. Teaching
Sociology, 18/4, 462–471.
Greenstreet, R. (1993). Academic Debate and Critical Thinking: A
Look at the Evidence.” National Forensic Journal, 11/1, 13–28.
Groarke, L. A., and C. W. Tindale. Good Reasoning Matters! A Con-
structive Approach to Critical Thinking, Canada: Oxford Universi-
ty Press.
Hensley, D., and D. Carlin (1994). Mastering Competitive Debate, 4th
Edition, Kansas: Carl Publishing.
Hill, B. (1993). The Value of Competitive Debate as a Vehicle for Pro-
moting Development of Critical Thiking Ability. CEDA Yearbook,
14, 1–23.
Hinck, E. A. (2003). Managing the Dialectical Tension between Com-
petition and Education in Forensics: A Response to Burnett, Brand,
& Meister. The National Forensic Journal, 21/2, 60–76.
Huber, R. B., and C. A. Snider (2005). Influencing through Argument,
New York: IDEA.
