Page 42 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 42
What Do We Know about the World?
Birdsell, D., and L. Groarke (2008). Outlines of A Theory of Visual Ar-
gument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43/3–4, 103–113.
Blair, J. A. (1996). The Possibility and Actuality of Visual Arguments.
Argumentation and Advocacy, 33/1, 23–39.
Carozza, L. (2009). The Emotional Mode of Argumentation: Descriptive,
People-Centered, and Process-Oriented, PhD Diss., Toronto: York
University.
Dove, I. J. (2012). Image, Evidence, Argument. Eemeren, F. H. van, and
B. Garssen (eds.). Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory. Am-
sterdam: Springer-Verlag.
Eemeren, F. H. van, and R. Grootendorst (1992). Argumentation, Com-
munication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hills-
dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured
Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43/4: 51–58.
Fleming, D. (1996). Can Pictures Be Arguments. Argumentation and
Advocacy. 33/1, 11–22.
Gilbert, M. A. (1997) Coalescent Argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Law-
rence Erlbaum Associates.
Gilbert, M. A. (2004). Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic.
Informal Logic, 24/3, 245–264.
Gorgias (1999). Encomium of Helen, translated by B. Donovan. Peitho’s
Web, Classical Rhetoric and Persuasion: http://www.classicpersua-
sion.org/pw/gorgias/helendonovan.htm.
Govier, T. (1983). Ad Hominem: Revising the Textbooks. Teaching Phi-
losophy, 6/1, 13–24.
Groarke, L., and C. W. Tindale (1986). Critical Thinking: How To
Teach Good Reasoning. Teaching Philosophy, 9/4, 301–318.
Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, Art and Argument. Informal Logic 18/2–3:
116–131.
Groarke, L., and C. W. Tindale (2012). Good Reasoning Matters! A Con-
structive Approach to Critical Thinking, 5th Edition, Toronto: Ox-
ford University.
Hample, D. (1985). A Third Perspective on Argument. Philosophy and
Rhetoric. 18 (1), 1–22.
Hample, D. (2005). Arguing: Exchanging Reasons Face to Face, London
and New York: Routledge.
Hitchcock, D. (2006) Why There Is No argumentum ad hominem Fal-
lacy. Unpublished. http://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~hitch-
ckd/adhominemissa.htm.
Birdsell, D., and L. Groarke (2008). Outlines of A Theory of Visual Ar-
gument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43/3–4, 103–113.
Blair, J. A. (1996). The Possibility and Actuality of Visual Arguments.
Argumentation and Advocacy, 33/1, 23–39.
Carozza, L. (2009). The Emotional Mode of Argumentation: Descriptive,
People-Centered, and Process-Oriented, PhD Diss., Toronto: York
University.
Dove, I. J. (2012). Image, Evidence, Argument. Eemeren, F. H. van, and
B. Garssen (eds.). Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory. Am-
sterdam: Springer-Verlag.
Eemeren, F. H. van, and R. Grootendorst (1992). Argumentation, Com-
munication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hills-
dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured
Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43/4: 51–58.
Fleming, D. (1996). Can Pictures Be Arguments. Argumentation and
Advocacy. 33/1, 11–22.
Gilbert, M. A. (1997) Coalescent Argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Law-
rence Erlbaum Associates.
Gilbert, M. A. (2004). Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic.
Informal Logic, 24/3, 245–264.
Gorgias (1999). Encomium of Helen, translated by B. Donovan. Peitho’s
Web, Classical Rhetoric and Persuasion: http://www.classicpersua-
sion.org/pw/gorgias/helendonovan.htm.
Govier, T. (1983). Ad Hominem: Revising the Textbooks. Teaching Phi-
losophy, 6/1, 13–24.
Groarke, L., and C. W. Tindale (1986). Critical Thinking: How To
Teach Good Reasoning. Teaching Philosophy, 9/4, 301–318.
Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, Art and Argument. Informal Logic 18/2–3:
116–131.
Groarke, L., and C. W. Tindale (2012). Good Reasoning Matters! A Con-
structive Approach to Critical Thinking, 5th Edition, Toronto: Ox-
ford University.
Hample, D. (1985). A Third Perspective on Argument. Philosophy and
Rhetoric. 18 (1), 1–22.
Hample, D. (2005). Arguing: Exchanging Reasons Face to Face, London
and New York: Routledge.
Hitchcock, D. (2006) Why There Is No argumentum ad hominem Fal-
lacy. Unpublished. http://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~hitch-
ckd/adhominemissa.htm.
