Page 43 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 43
the elements of argument: six steps to a thick theory 43
Johnson, R. H. (2000). Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Ar-
gument, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Johnson, R. H. (2005). Why “Visual Arguments” aren’t Arguments.
Hansen, H. V., C. Tindale, J. A. Blair, and R. H. Johnson (eds.). In-
formal Logic at 25. Windsor: University of Windsor.
Lunsford, A. A., J. J. Ruszkiewicz, and K. Walters (2010). Everything’s
an Argument, New York: Bedford’s/St. Martin’s.
O’Keefe, D. J. (1977). Two Concepts of Argument. Journal of the Amer-
ican Forensic Association, 13/2: 121–128.
Roque, G. (2008). Political Rhetoric in Visual Images. Weigand, E.
(ed.). Dialogue and Rhetoric. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Ben-
jamins Publishing Company.
Shelley, C. (1996). Rhetorical and Demonstrative Modes of Visual Ar-
gument: Looking at Images of Human Evolution, Argumentation
and Advocacy, 33/2, 53–68.
Slade, C. (2002). The Real Thing: Doing Philosophy with the Media, New
York: Peter Lang.
Tindale, C. W. (2010). Reason’s Dark Champions: Constructive Strate-
gies of Sophistic Argument, Columbia: University of South Caroli-
na Press.
Van den Hoven, P. J. (2011). Iconicity in Visual and Verbal Argumen-
tation. Eemeren, F. H. van, B. Garssen, D. Godden, and G. Mitch-
ell (eds.). Seventh International Conference of the International So-
ciety for the Study of Argumentation: Proceedings. Amsterdam: Sic
Sat, 831–834.
Walton, D. N. (2007). Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation, Amster-
dam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wreen, M. (1988a). Admit No Force But Argument. Informal Logic,
10/1, 89–96.
Wreen, M. (1088b), May the Force Be With You. Argumentation 2/3:
425–440.
Johnson, R. H. (2000). Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Ar-
gument, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Johnson, R. H. (2005). Why “Visual Arguments” aren’t Arguments.
Hansen, H. V., C. Tindale, J. A. Blair, and R. H. Johnson (eds.). In-
formal Logic at 25. Windsor: University of Windsor.
Lunsford, A. A., J. J. Ruszkiewicz, and K. Walters (2010). Everything’s
an Argument, New York: Bedford’s/St. Martin’s.
O’Keefe, D. J. (1977). Two Concepts of Argument. Journal of the Amer-
ican Forensic Association, 13/2: 121–128.
Roque, G. (2008). Political Rhetoric in Visual Images. Weigand, E.
(ed.). Dialogue and Rhetoric. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Ben-
jamins Publishing Company.
Shelley, C. (1996). Rhetorical and Demonstrative Modes of Visual Ar-
gument: Looking at Images of Human Evolution, Argumentation
and Advocacy, 33/2, 53–68.
Slade, C. (2002). The Real Thing: Doing Philosophy with the Media, New
York: Peter Lang.
Tindale, C. W. (2010). Reason’s Dark Champions: Constructive Strate-
gies of Sophistic Argument, Columbia: University of South Caroli-
na Press.
Van den Hoven, P. J. (2011). Iconicity in Visual and Verbal Argumen-
tation. Eemeren, F. H. van, B. Garssen, D. Godden, and G. Mitch-
ell (eds.). Seventh International Conference of the International So-
ciety for the Study of Argumentation: Proceedings. Amsterdam: Sic
Sat, 831–834.
Walton, D. N. (2007). Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation, Amster-
dam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wreen, M. (1988a). Admit No Force But Argument. Informal Logic,
10/1, 89–96.
Wreen, M. (1088b), May the Force Be With You. Argumentation 2/3:
425–440.
