Page 321 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 321
ching the writing of argumentative genre through imitatio:
a solid basis for the ‘beginner’ writers 321
Badger, R., and G. White. (2000). A Process Genre Approach to Teach-
ing Writing. ELT Journal, 54/2, 153–160.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The Problem of Speech Genres. Emerson, C.,
and M. Holquist (eds.). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Aus-
tin: University of Texas Press, 60–102.
Barthes, R. (1981). Theory of the Eext. Young, R. (ed.). Untying the Text.
London: Routledge, 31–47.
Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and Cognitive Development: Beyond
Writing to Learn. Bazerman, C., et al. (eds.). Genre in a Changing
World. West Lafayette, Indiana:The WAC Clearinghouse and Par-
lor Press, 279–294.
Beaufort, A. (2007). College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework
for University Writing Instruction, Logan, Utah: Utah State Uni-
versity Press.
Berlin, J. A. (1988). Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class. College
English, 50/5, 477–494.
Blommaert, J., and C. Bulcaen (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. An-
nual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447–466.
Butler, P. (2002). Imitation as Freedom: (Re)forming Student Writing.
The Quarterly, 24/2, 25–32.
Caccamise, D. J. (1987). Idea Generation in Writing. Matsuhashi, A.
(ed.). Writing in Real Time. Norwood: Ablex, 224–253.
Cagarin, M. (ed.) (2000). Isocrates I, Austin, TX: University of Texas
Press.
Cameron, L. (1996). Discourse Context and the development of Meta-
phor in Children. Current Issues in Language and Society, 3/1, 49–
64.
Cicero (2008). De Oratore, Athens: Polis.
Cicero (1954). Ad Herennium, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University
Press.
Clark, D. L. (1951). Imitation: Theory and Practice in Roman Rhetoric.
Quarterly Journal of Speech, 37/1, 11–22.
Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Edu-
cational and Psychological Measurement, 20/1, 37–46.
Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis (1993). The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Ap-
proach to Teaching Writing, London: Falmer Press.
Corbett, E. P. J. The Theory and Practice of Imitation in Classical Rhet-
oric. College Composition and Communication, 22/3, 243–250.
Corbett, E. P. J., and R. J. Connors (1999). Classical Rhetoric for the
Modern Student, N.Y./Oxford: Oxford University Press.
a solid basis for the ‘beginner’ writers 321
Badger, R., and G. White. (2000). A Process Genre Approach to Teach-
ing Writing. ELT Journal, 54/2, 153–160.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The Problem of Speech Genres. Emerson, C.,
and M. Holquist (eds.). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Aus-
tin: University of Texas Press, 60–102.
Barthes, R. (1981). Theory of the Eext. Young, R. (ed.). Untying the Text.
London: Routledge, 31–47.
Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and Cognitive Development: Beyond
Writing to Learn. Bazerman, C., et al. (eds.). Genre in a Changing
World. West Lafayette, Indiana:The WAC Clearinghouse and Par-
lor Press, 279–294.
Beaufort, A. (2007). College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework
for University Writing Instruction, Logan, Utah: Utah State Uni-
versity Press.
Berlin, J. A. (1988). Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class. College
English, 50/5, 477–494.
Blommaert, J., and C. Bulcaen (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. An-
nual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447–466.
Butler, P. (2002). Imitation as Freedom: (Re)forming Student Writing.
The Quarterly, 24/2, 25–32.
Caccamise, D. J. (1987). Idea Generation in Writing. Matsuhashi, A.
(ed.). Writing in Real Time. Norwood: Ablex, 224–253.
Cagarin, M. (ed.) (2000). Isocrates I, Austin, TX: University of Texas
Press.
Cameron, L. (1996). Discourse Context and the development of Meta-
phor in Children. Current Issues in Language and Society, 3/1, 49–
64.
Cicero (2008). De Oratore, Athens: Polis.
Cicero (1954). Ad Herennium, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University
Press.
Clark, D. L. (1951). Imitation: Theory and Practice in Roman Rhetoric.
Quarterly Journal of Speech, 37/1, 11–22.
Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Edu-
cational and Psychological Measurement, 20/1, 37–46.
Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis (1993). The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Ap-
proach to Teaching Writing, London: Falmer Press.
Corbett, E. P. J. The Theory and Practice of Imitation in Classical Rhet-
oric. College Composition and Communication, 22/3, 243–250.
Corbett, E. P. J., and R. J. Connors (1999). Classical Rhetoric for the
Modern Student, N.Y./Oxford: Oxford University Press.
