Page 269 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 269
taking judges seriously 269
Feteris, E. T. (1999). Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. A Survey
of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions, Dordrecht: Klu-
wer.
Feteris, E. T. (2009). Strategic Manoeuvring with Linguistic Arguments
in Legal Decisions. Feteris, E. T., and H. J. Plug (eds.). Argumenta-
tion and the Application of Legal Rules. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, 55–73.
Hage, J. C. (2004). Law and Coherence. Ratio Juris, 17/1, 87–105.
Hage, J. C., R. Leenes, and A. R. Lodder (1993). Hard Cases: A Proce-
dural Approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2/2, 113–167.
Lolli, G. (1991). Introduzione alla logica formale, Bologna: Il Mulino.
Luzzati, C. (1990). La vaghezza delle norme: un’analisi del linguaggio gi-
uridico, Milano: Giuffrè.
MacCormick, N. (1978). Legal Theory and Legal Reasoning, Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Manzin, M. (1994). Il petrarchismo giuridico. Filosofia e logica del diritto
agli inizi dell’umanesimo giuridico, Padova: Cedam.
Manzin, M. (2004). Ricordando Perelman: dopo e oltre la “nouvelle
rhétorique”. Ferrari, G., and M. Manzin (eds.). La retorica fra scien-
za e professione legale. Questioni di metodo. Milano: Giuffrè, 17–22.
Manzin, M. (2008). Ordo Iuris. La nascita del pensiero sistematico, Mi-
lano: Franco Angeli.
Manzin, M. (2009). L’ordine infranto. Ambiguità e limiti del sillogi-
smo giudiziale nell’età postmoderna. Tigor: rivista di scienze della
comunicazione, 1/1, 31–41. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/3188 (31. Au-
gust 2012).
Manzin, M. “La verità retorica del diritto. Patterson.” D. Diritto e veri-
tà, 9-51. Milano: Giuffrè, 2010.
Manzin, M. (2011). Rhetorical vs. Syllogistic Models of Legal Reason-
ing: The Italian Experience. Eemeren, F. H. Van, B. Garssen, D.
Godden, and G. Mitchell (eds.). Proceedings of the 7th Conference of
International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam:
Rozenberg/Sic Sat, 1165–1174.
Manzin, M. (2012a). Vérité et logos dans la perspective de la rhétorique
judiciaire. Contributions perelmaniennes à la culture juridique du
troisième millénaire. Frydman, B., and M. Meyer (eds.). Chaïm Pe-
relman. De la nouvelle rhétorique à la logique juridique. Paris: P.U.F
– Presses Universitaires de France, 261–288.
Manzin, M. (2012b). A Rhetorical Approach to Legal Reasoning. The
Italian Experience of CERMEG. Eemeren, F. H. van, and B. Gars-
Feteris, E. T. (1999). Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. A Survey
of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions, Dordrecht: Klu-
wer.
Feteris, E. T. (2009). Strategic Manoeuvring with Linguistic Arguments
in Legal Decisions. Feteris, E. T., and H. J. Plug (eds.). Argumenta-
tion and the Application of Legal Rules. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, 55–73.
Hage, J. C. (2004). Law and Coherence. Ratio Juris, 17/1, 87–105.
Hage, J. C., R. Leenes, and A. R. Lodder (1993). Hard Cases: A Proce-
dural Approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2/2, 113–167.
Lolli, G. (1991). Introduzione alla logica formale, Bologna: Il Mulino.
Luzzati, C. (1990). La vaghezza delle norme: un’analisi del linguaggio gi-
uridico, Milano: Giuffrè.
MacCormick, N. (1978). Legal Theory and Legal Reasoning, Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Manzin, M. (1994). Il petrarchismo giuridico. Filosofia e logica del diritto
agli inizi dell’umanesimo giuridico, Padova: Cedam.
Manzin, M. (2004). Ricordando Perelman: dopo e oltre la “nouvelle
rhétorique”. Ferrari, G., and M. Manzin (eds.). La retorica fra scien-
za e professione legale. Questioni di metodo. Milano: Giuffrè, 17–22.
Manzin, M. (2008). Ordo Iuris. La nascita del pensiero sistematico, Mi-
lano: Franco Angeli.
Manzin, M. (2009). L’ordine infranto. Ambiguità e limiti del sillogi-
smo giudiziale nell’età postmoderna. Tigor: rivista di scienze della
comunicazione, 1/1, 31–41. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/3188 (31. Au-
gust 2012).
Manzin, M. “La verità retorica del diritto. Patterson.” D. Diritto e veri-
tà, 9-51. Milano: Giuffrè, 2010.
Manzin, M. (2011). Rhetorical vs. Syllogistic Models of Legal Reason-
ing: The Italian Experience. Eemeren, F. H. Van, B. Garssen, D.
Godden, and G. Mitchell (eds.). Proceedings of the 7th Conference of
International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam:
Rozenberg/Sic Sat, 1165–1174.
Manzin, M. (2012a). Vérité et logos dans la perspective de la rhétorique
judiciaire. Contributions perelmaniennes à la culture juridique du
troisième millénaire. Frydman, B., and M. Meyer (eds.). Chaïm Pe-
relman. De la nouvelle rhétorique à la logique juridique. Paris: P.U.F
– Presses Universitaires de France, 261–288.
Manzin, M. (2012b). A Rhetorical Approach to Legal Reasoning. The
Italian Experience of CERMEG. Eemeren, F. H. van, and B. Gars-
