Page 11 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 11
contents 11
3.1. Critical Discourse Analysis (Lexico-Grammatical Analysis
and Figures of Speech) 184
3.2. Rhetorical Argumentation Analysis 189
3.2.1. preferred types of argument in the speeches 191
of europhiles
3.2.2. preferred types of argument in the speeches 194
of europhobes
4. Conclusion 198
References 200
Rhetoric – Martial Art or the Art of Winning the Soul by
Discourse? Language of Politicians vs. Ethos, Pathos and Logos 203
■ Joanna Szczepańska-Włoch, Jagiellonian University
1. Introduction 203
2. Data Presentation 204
3. Stages of Shaping the Composition 205
3.1. Inventio 205
3.1.1. ethos 206
3.1.2. ethos – patterns of behaviour adopted by 207
the persuader
3.1.3. pathos 211
3.1.4. logos 213
3.1.5. modelsofargumentversuslanguageofpoliticians 216
4. Conclusion 219
References 220
The Analysis of Insulting Practices – Sticks and Stones 225
in the Croatian Parliament
■ Alma Vančura, University of Osijek and Diana Tomić, University of Zagreb
1. Introduction 226
1.2. Rationale 226
1.3. Research Questions 227
1.4. Historical Overview 227
2. Theoretical Background 228
2.1. Insults and Culture 228
3.1. Critical Discourse Analysis (Lexico-Grammatical Analysis
and Figures of Speech) 184
3.2. Rhetorical Argumentation Analysis 189
3.2.1. preferred types of argument in the speeches 191
of europhiles
3.2.2. preferred types of argument in the speeches 194
of europhobes
4. Conclusion 198
References 200
Rhetoric – Martial Art or the Art of Winning the Soul by
Discourse? Language of Politicians vs. Ethos, Pathos and Logos 203
■ Joanna Szczepańska-Włoch, Jagiellonian University
1. Introduction 203
2. Data Presentation 204
3. Stages of Shaping the Composition 205
3.1. Inventio 205
3.1.1. ethos 206
3.1.2. ethos – patterns of behaviour adopted by 207
the persuader
3.1.3. pathos 211
3.1.4. logos 213
3.1.5. modelsofargumentversuslanguageofpoliticians 216
4. Conclusion 219
References 220
The Analysis of Insulting Practices – Sticks and Stones 225
in the Croatian Parliament
■ Alma Vančura, University of Osijek and Diana Tomić, University of Zagreb
1. Introduction 226
1.2. Rationale 226
1.3. Research Questions 227
1.4. Historical Overview 227
2. Theoretical Background 228
2.1. Insults and Culture 228
