Page 13 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 13
What is Legal Truth? contents 13
10. Why Legal Truths are Truths
11. Some Conclusions 263
265
References 266
268
IV. education 273
Debate as an Educational Tool: Is Polarization a Debate 275
Side Effect?
275
■ Manuele De Conti, University of Padua 277
1. Debate and Competitive Debate: Framework and Definition 279
281
1.1. Debate’s Positive Impacts 283
2. Polarization as a Debate “Side Effect” 284
285
3. Is Polarization a “Side Effect”?
286
3.1. Against Bias Assimilation as a Debating Consequence 287
3.2. Rejecting Close-Mindedness as Debating Outcomes 291
3.3. Discounting Dichotomization as a Debating Impact 292
3.4. Dismissing Disagreement and Conflict Escalating
Attitudes as Necessary Debating Results 301
4. Detractors Mistakes
301
5. Conclusion 302
302
References 303
303
Teaching the Writing of Argumentative Genre through 304
Imitatio: A Solid Basis for the “Beginner” Writers 305
■ Fotini Egglezou, Athens 307
307
1. Introduction
2. Historic Roots of Imitatio in Rhetorical Pedagogy
2.1. The Ancient Theoretical Pedigree
2.2. Greco-Roman Conceptions of Imitatio
2.3. Quintilian and the Pedagogical Use of Imitatio
2.4. The Period of the Crisis
2.5. The Modern Look at Imitatio
3. Purpose of the Research
4. Materials and Methods
10. Why Legal Truths are Truths
11. Some Conclusions 263
265
References 266
268
IV. education 273
Debate as an Educational Tool: Is Polarization a Debate 275
Side Effect?
275
■ Manuele De Conti, University of Padua 277
1. Debate and Competitive Debate: Framework and Definition 279
281
1.1. Debate’s Positive Impacts 283
2. Polarization as a Debate “Side Effect” 284
285
3. Is Polarization a “Side Effect”?
286
3.1. Against Bias Assimilation as a Debating Consequence 287
3.2. Rejecting Close-Mindedness as Debating Outcomes 291
3.3. Discounting Dichotomization as a Debating Impact 292
3.4. Dismissing Disagreement and Conflict Escalating
Attitudes as Necessary Debating Results 301
4. Detractors Mistakes
301
5. Conclusion 302
302
References 303
303
Teaching the Writing of Argumentative Genre through 304
Imitatio: A Solid Basis for the “Beginner” Writers 305
■ Fotini Egglezou, Athens 307
307
1. Introduction
2. Historic Roots of Imitatio in Rhetorical Pedagogy
2.1. The Ancient Theoretical Pedigree
2.2. Greco-Roman Conceptions of Imitatio
2.3. Quintilian and the Pedagogical Use of Imitatio
2.4. The Period of the Crisis
2.5. The Modern Look at Imitatio
3. Purpose of the Research
4. Materials and Methods
