Page 166 - Ana Mlekuž in Igor Ž. Žagar, ur. • Raziskovanje v vzgoji in izobraževanju: Izobraževanje učiteljic in učiteljev za raziskovalno učenje in poučevanje. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut, 2024. Digitalna knjižnica, Dissertationes 48
P. 166

raziskovanje v vzgoji in izobraževanju: izobraževanje učiteljic in učiteljev ...
                 The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being scale (WEMWBS; Ten-
            nant et al., 2007) was used as a measure of mental well-being. Fourteen
            items (1 = “never” to 5 = “always”; originally formulated as 1 = “none of the
            time” to 5 = “all of the time”) assessed the frequency of positive aspects
            of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reliability and validity
            are well documented, including on a Slovenian sample (Cilar et al., 2019).
            Cronbach's α in our study ranged from .90 to .96 in our four measurements.
                 COVID-19 anxiety  measured specific situational anxiety during the
            pandemic. The scale created for this study is based on the items from the
            LAOM (Lestvica Anksioznosti za Otroke in Mladostnike) Anxiety Scale
            (Kozina, 2012). The 4 items aimed to capture anxiety specific to the COV-
            ID-19 pandemic (e.g., “I am worried about getting infected with COV-
            ID-19.”). Participants reported how often the statements were true for them
            during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 = “never” to 5 = “always”). Its validity
            is supported through correlations with established measures (e.g., general
            anxiety, mental well-being; Kozina et al., 2021). Cronbach's α in our study
            ranged from .85 to .91 in our four measurements.
                 The  Emotional Self-Efficacy  scale (Muris,  2002) is taken  from  the
            self-efficacy questionnaire for children (SEQ-C). The eight items (1 = “not
            at all” to 5 = “very well”) evaluate the ability to regulate unpleasant emo-
            tions. Its reliability and validity are well-documented in children and ad-
            olescents (Tan & Chellappan, 2018), and the scale has also been used with
            adults (Vieluf et al., 2020). Cronbach's α in our study ranged from .87 to .96
            in our four measurements.
                 The use of Inner (meditation-based) and Body (yoga-based) exercises
            were indicated by providing the most appropriate response about an expe-
            rience with, and interest in meditation, or similar inner exercises, and yoga
            or similar body exercises. The five possible answers were: 1 - “I meditate or
            practice similar inner exercises on a regular basis.”; 2 - “I have done medi-
            tation or similar inner exercises before and I like it, but I don’t practice on
            a regular basis.”; 3 - “I have done meditation or similar inner exercises be-
            fore, but it is not the right thing for me.” 4 - “I have never done meditation
            or similar inner exercises before, but I would like to try.” 5 - “I have never
            done meditation or similar inner exercises before and I am not interested
            in trying it out.” As both inner and body exercises correspond to practicing
            mindfulness, the answers were used as indicators of the variable Practicing
            Mindfulness. The answers were recoded to 1 [practicing mindfulness, which


            166
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171