Page 165 - Ana Mlekuž in Igor Ž. Žagar, ur. • Raziskovanje v vzgoji in izobraževanju: Izobraževanje učiteljic in učiteljev za raziskovalno učenje in poučevanje. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut, 2024. Digitalna knjižnica, Dissertationes 48
P. 165

longitudinal analysis of covid-19 anxiety and mental well-being during lockdown ...
                 We aim to answer specific research questions:

            1.   Has mental well-being changed during the lockdown for the
                 COVID-19 pandemic?
            2.   Has COVID-19 anxiety changed during the lockdown for the
                 COVID-19 pandemic?
            3.   Do emotional self-efficacy and practicing mindfulness have
                 an effect on the initial levels and changes in COVID-19 anxie-
                 ty and mental well-being during the lockdown for the COVID-19
                 pandemic?

                 2  Method

                 2.1  Participants
            Forty-five Slovenian participants were included in the convenience sample,
            collected via the snowball method (through email lists and social media).
            The data comes from a larger study of psychological responses to the COV-
            ID-19 pandemic, but only participants with complete data from  at least
            two-time points were included in the current sample. The participants (n =
            45) at time 1 (T1) were mostly female (86.7%; 11.1% male; 2.2% non-binary),
            aged between 18 and 72 (M = 39.4; SD = 14.6), employed (62.2%; 13.3% stu-
            dents; 11.1% retired; 8.9% self-employed; 4.4% unemployed), mostly worked
            from home (59.4%; 21.9% mostly worked at their workplace; 12.5% waiting
            at home; 6.3% other), had completed a 4-to-5 year university degree (48.9
            %; 20.0% 2-to-3 year higher education degree, 15.6% doctorate or scientific
            Master’s program; 13.3% high school, 2.2% non-completed primary school),
            lived with one other person (40%; 28.9 lived with two other persons; 20%
            lived with three or more other persons; 11.1% lived alone), and indicated that
            they were not infected with COVID-19 (97.8%; 2.2 % did not know because
            they weren’t tested). The participant demographics at T2 (n = 41; 85.4% fe-
            male), T3 (n = 21; 95.2% female), and T4 (n = 18; 88.9% female) did not signif-
            icantly differ compared to T1.

                 2.2  Instruments
            The instrument battery consisted of questionnaires capturing psycholog-
            ical responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and emotional competencies.
            Demographics and information on being interested in or using inner and/
            or body exercises were collected. Items were reformulated to match the spe-
            cific period of the COVID-19 pandemic.


                                                                              165
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170