Page 127 - Žagar, Igor Ž. 2021. Four Critical Essays on Argumentation. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut.
P. 127
perception, infer ence, and understanding in visual argumentation (and beyond)
‘Reality’
Social ‘reality’ Social ‘reality’
Framed ‘reality’ Framed ‘reality’
F (p) F' (p)
q q'
R (speaker’s mental space) M (addressee’s mental space)
Enchronic view
Enchronic view embraces both, synchronic and diachronic perspective.
Since it is concerned with relations between data from neighbouring mo-
ments, enchronic analysis is therefore looking at sequences of social inter-
action in which the moves that constitute social actions occur as responses
to other such moves and in turn these give rise to other such moves.
Enchronic analysis is therefore constantly moving from synchronic to
diachronic, thus constructing a new perspective, relative to and relevant for
the particular moment in time, its representation and (re)construction of a
particular mental space.
127
‘Reality’
Social ‘reality’ Social ‘reality’
Framed ‘reality’ Framed ‘reality’
F (p) F' (p)
q q'
R (speaker’s mental space) M (addressee’s mental space)
Enchronic view
Enchronic view embraces both, synchronic and diachronic perspective.
Since it is concerned with relations between data from neighbouring mo-
ments, enchronic analysis is therefore looking at sequences of social inter-
action in which the moves that constitute social actions occur as responses
to other such moves and in turn these give rise to other such moves.
Enchronic analysis is therefore constantly moving from synchronic to
diachronic, thus constructing a new perspective, relative to and relevant for
the particular moment in time, its representation and (re)construction of a
particular mental space.
127
