Page 59 - Štremfel, Urška, ed., 2016. Student (Under)achievement: Perspectives, Approaches, Challenges. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut. Digital Library, Documenta 11.
P. 59
le 2: A comparison between the achievement of Slovenian 15-year-
old students and the OECD average and levels achieved in PISA assess-
ments to date

SVN OECD aver- Difference Percentage Percent- Percent-
READING average age (s. e.) (s. e.) of students age of stu- age of stu-
who do not dents who dents who
(s. e.) * 489 (0.5) 5 (1,1) p achieve Lev- achieve Lev- achieve a
494 (0.5) –11 (1,1) q el 2 (s. e.) els 2 or 3 minimum
497 (0.5) –15 (1,3) q (s. e.) of Level 4
(s. e.)

PISA 2006 494 (1.0) 16.5 (0.6) 56.3 (0.8) 27.2 (0.7)
PISA 2009 483 (1.0)
PISA 2012 481 (1.2) 21.2 (0.6) 54.9 (0.9) 23.9 (0.7)

21.1 (0.7) 55.6 (1.0) 23.3 (0.7)

*Standard errors (s.e.) for the calculated estimates based on samples of
students are indicated in brackets.

Percentage Percent- Percent- 59
of students age of stu- age of stu-
MATHE- SVN aver- OECD aver- Difference who do not dents who dents who
MATICS age (s. e.) age (s. e.) (s. e.) achieve Lev- achieve Lev- achieve a
el 2 els 2 or 3 minimum of
(s. e.) (s. e.) Level 4
(s. e.)

PISA 2006 504 (1.0) 494 (0.5) 10 (1,1) p 17.7 (0.7) 49.5 (1.0) 32.6 (0.6)
PISA 2009 501 (1.2) 495 (0.5) 6 (1,2) p
PISA 2012 501 (1.2) 494 (0.5) 7 (1,2) p 20.3 (0.5) 46.4 (0.8) 33.2 (0.8)

20.1 (0.6) 47.5 (1.0) 32.4 (0.8)

*Standard errors (s.e.) for the calculated estimates based on samples of
students are indicated in brackets.

SCIENCE SVN aver- OECD aver- Difference Percentage Percent- Percent-
age (s. e.) age (s. e.) (s. e.) of students age of stu- age of stu-
who do not dents who dents who
achieve Lev- achieve Lev- achieve a
el 2 els 2 or 3 minimum of
(s. e.) (s. e.) Level 4
(s. e.)

PISA 2006 519 (1.1) 498 (0.5) 21 (1,2) p 13.9 (0.6) 50.7 (1.0) 35.4 (0.8)
PISA 2009 512 (1.1) 501 (0.5) 11 (1,2) p
PISA 2012 514 (1.3) 501 (0.5) 13 (1,2) p 14.8 (0,5) 52.4 (0.9) 32.9 (0.9)

12.9 (0,6) 54.6 (0.9) 32.6 (0.7)

*Standard errors (s.e.) for the calculated estimates based on samples of
students are indicated in brackets.

low reading achievement in pisa 2009
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64