Page 25 - Ana Kozina and Nora Wiium, eds. ▪︎ Positive Youth Development in Contexts. Ljubljana: Educational Research Institute, 2021. Digital Library, Dissertationes (Scientific Monographs), 42.
P. 25
positive youth development and thriving in norwegian youthNumber of thriving indicators reportedTotal
N (%)
Demographic variables Table 1: Cross-tabulation Analysis of Thriving and Demographic Variables of Norwegian Youth.012345 6 7
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) 260 (44.4)
25 17 (48.6) 22 (52.4) 21 (53.8) 1 (100.0) 326 (55.6)
Gender Male 18 (51.4) 20 (47.6) 34 (45.9) 67 (49.6) 58 (36.3) 40 (40.0) 18 (46.2) 0 (0.0) 586 (100.0)
Age Female 35 (6.0) 42 (7.2) 39 (6.7) 1 (0.2)
Total 2 (6.5) 3 (7.5) 40 (54.1) 68 (50.4) 102 (63.7) 60 (60.0) 1 (2.9) 0 (0.0) 29 (5.5)
Father’s 15 9 (29.0) 17 (42.5) 21 (60.0) 1 (100) 220 (41.5)
education 16 13 (41.9) 11 (27.5) 74 (12.6) 135 (23.0) 160 (27.3) 100 (17.1) 8 (22.9) 0 (0.0) 171 (32.3)
17 7 (22.6) 8 (20.0) 5 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 101 (19.1)
18 0 (0.0) 1 (2.5) 3 (4.5) 8 (6.5) 4 (2.8) 8 (8.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
19 31 (5.8) 40 (7.5) 35 (6.6) 1 (0.2) 9 (1.7)
Total 7 (18.9) 19 (28.8) 42 (33.9) 73 (51.0) 38 (42.2) 3 (8.3) 530 (100)
High scho- 7 (22.6)
ol or less 30 (81.1) 25 (37.9) 41 (33.1) 43 (30.1) 30 (33.3) 33 (91.7)
More than 24 (77.4)
high school 37 (7.2) 16 (24.2) 30 (24.2) 23 (16.1) 12 (13.3) 36 (7.0)

2 (5.6) 3 (4.5) 3 (2.4) 0 (0.0) 2 (2.2) 2 (5.6)

34 (94.4) 66 (12.5) 124 (23.4) 143 (27.0) 90 (17.0) 34 (94.4)

36 (6.7) 14 (24.1) 18 (15.0) 15 (10.8) 15 (16.1) 36 (6.7) 0 (0.0) 79 (15.3)

44 (75.9) 102 (85.0) 124 (89.2) 78 (83.9) 1 (100) 436 (84.7)

Total 31 (6.0) 58 (11.3) 120 (23.3) 139 (27.0) 93 (18.1) 1 (0.2) 515 (100)

Mother’s High scho- 6 (18.8) 12 (20.0) 22 (17.7) 18 (11.8) 19 (20.2) 0 (0.0) 81 (15.1)
education ol or less 26 (81.3)
More than
high school 48 (80.0) 102 (82.3) 135 (88.2) 75 (79.8) 1 (100) 455 (84.9)

Total 32 (6.0) 60 (11.2) 124 (23.1) 153 (28.5) 94 (17.5) 1 (0.2) 536 (100)
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30