Page 362 - Gabrijela Kišiček and Igor Ž. Žagar (eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives, Digital Library, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana 2013
P. 362
What Do We Know about the World?
information about sports events. Written sports discourse uses the ad-
vantage of headlines as attractors and that is the reason why every fifth
instance of antonomasia appeared there.
The most important contribution of this research is the affirma-
tion of the role which antonomasia has inside sports discourse. It con-
nects journalists and the recipients of sports news (reader, spectators
and listeners) and identifies them as participants in sports discourse.
Although many sports antonomasias have transcended their original
discourse and have become known to the general audience, there are
still many more of them which are known and used only by true con-
noisseurs.
References
Anderson, R. D. (2000). A Glossary of Greek Rhetorical Terms, Leuven:
Peeters.
Brdar, M., and Brdar-Szabó, R. (2001). Vlastita imena između meton-
imijske Scile i metaforičke Haribde. Rasprave Instituta za hrvatski
jezik i jezikoslovlje, 27, 31–48.
Burke, K. (1969). A Grammar of Motives, Berkeley/Los Angeles/Lon-
don: University of California Press.
Grgić, A., and Nikolić, D. (2011a). Upotreba i prepoznavanje an-
tonomazija – usporedba mlađih i starijih govornika. Govor, 28/1,
25–43.
Grgić, A., and Nikolić, D. (2011b). Antonomazija – figura kulturnoga
pamćenja. Fluminensia, 23/2, 129–142.
Holmqvist, K., and J. Płuciennik (2010). Princess Antonomasia and the
Truth: Two Types of Metonymic Relations. Burkhardt, A., and B.
Nerlich (eds.). Tropical Truth(s). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter,
373–381.
Ivas, I. (2004). Tropi u novinskim naslovima. Medijska istraživanja,
10/2, 9–34.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, New York/
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture – Universality and Variation,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krišković, A., and S. Tominac (2009). Metonymy Based on Cultur-
al Background Knowledge and Pragmatic Inferencing: Evidence
from Spoken Discourse. Fluminensia, 21/2, 49–72.
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live by, Chicago/
London: The University of Chicago Press.
information about sports events. Written sports discourse uses the ad-
vantage of headlines as attractors and that is the reason why every fifth
instance of antonomasia appeared there.
The most important contribution of this research is the affirma-
tion of the role which antonomasia has inside sports discourse. It con-
nects journalists and the recipients of sports news (reader, spectators
and listeners) and identifies them as participants in sports discourse.
Although many sports antonomasias have transcended their original
discourse and have become known to the general audience, there are
still many more of them which are known and used only by true con-
noisseurs.
References
Anderson, R. D. (2000). A Glossary of Greek Rhetorical Terms, Leuven:
Peeters.
Brdar, M., and Brdar-Szabó, R. (2001). Vlastita imena između meton-
imijske Scile i metaforičke Haribde. Rasprave Instituta za hrvatski
jezik i jezikoslovlje, 27, 31–48.
Burke, K. (1969). A Grammar of Motives, Berkeley/Los Angeles/Lon-
don: University of California Press.
Grgić, A., and Nikolić, D. (2011a). Upotreba i prepoznavanje an-
tonomazija – usporedba mlađih i starijih govornika. Govor, 28/1,
25–43.
Grgić, A., and Nikolić, D. (2011b). Antonomazija – figura kulturnoga
pamćenja. Fluminensia, 23/2, 129–142.
Holmqvist, K., and J. Płuciennik (2010). Princess Antonomasia and the
Truth: Two Types of Metonymic Relations. Burkhardt, A., and B.
Nerlich (eds.). Tropical Truth(s). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter,
373–381.
Ivas, I. (2004). Tropi u novinskim naslovima. Medijska istraživanja,
10/2, 9–34.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, New York/
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture – Universality and Variation,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krišković, A., and S. Tominac (2009). Metonymy Based on Cultur-
al Background Knowledge and Pragmatic Inferencing: Evidence
from Spoken Discourse. Fluminensia, 21/2, 49–72.
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live by, Chicago/
London: The University of Chicago Press.
