Page 148 - Žagar, Igor Ž. 2021. Four Critical Essays on Argumentation. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut.
P. 148
four critical essays on argumentation
conclusion 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, F
34, 36, 38, 39, 45, 46, 50, 53, 64, 65,
78, 79, 85, 87, 98, 101, 111, 112, 114, Fairclough, Norman 14, 54
115, 121, 125, 126 fallacies 9, 37, 38, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46,
content-related 14, 15, 16 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59,
context-dependent reasoning 27 60, 61, 62, 63, 65
contexts 30, 40, 41 false 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 51, 53, 58, 62,
conventional signs 99, 101 65, 66, 117
conviction 43, 44 falsity 38, 39, 40, 41, 43
convince 16, 42, 43, 118 Fauconnier, Gilles 125
criteria 17, 18, 32, 33, 38, 39, 42, 43, Fillmore, Charles 75, 76, 124
Fiorentino, Rosso 116
44, 45, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 66 formal language 41
critical discourse analysis 9, 11, 13, Fowler, Roger 54
frame 30, 31, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 81, 86,
14, 18, 33, 37, 54, 55 87, 109, 112, 123, 124, 125, 126
Curtius, Ernst Robert 32 frame analysis 74
framing 40, 72, 78, 107, 112, 125
D
G
data 14, 32, 34, 48, 49, 58, 62, 85, 96,
102, 108, 110, 127 Garssen 56
gaze 95, 99, 101, 110
David, Jacques-Louis 45, 106, 108, gesture 95, 99, 101
115, 116, 117, 121 Girodet de Roussy-Trioson, Anne-
David’s Marat 108, 116 Louis 116
Deleuze, Gilles 82, 114 Gödel, Kurt 46
De Morgan 44 Goffman, Erving 75, 124
Dijk, Teun 13, 18, 21, 54 Groarke, Leo 69, 70, 75, 76, 78, 84,
discourse 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21,
85, 86, 87, 89, 90, 101, 102, 103, 109,
22, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 54, 55, 70 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119,
discourse fragment 20, 29, 36 120
discourse-historical approach (DHA) Groarke, Louis 116
Grootendorst, Rob 56, 57
13, 14, 15, 19, 26, 29, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37, Guattari, Félix 82, 114
54, 55, 56, 57
doing 29, 38, 80 H
Ducrot, Oswald 81
Halliday, Michael 54
E
Eemeren, Frans H. 56, 57
enchronic analysis 96, 110, 127
Enfield, Nick J. 96, 97, 110
enthymemetic 21
148
conclusion 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, F
34, 36, 38, 39, 45, 46, 50, 53, 64, 65,
78, 79, 85, 87, 98, 101, 111, 112, 114, Fairclough, Norman 14, 54
115, 121, 125, 126 fallacies 9, 37, 38, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46,
content-related 14, 15, 16 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59,
context-dependent reasoning 27 60, 61, 62, 63, 65
contexts 30, 40, 41 false 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 51, 53, 58, 62,
conventional signs 99, 101 65, 66, 117
conviction 43, 44 falsity 38, 39, 40, 41, 43
convince 16, 42, 43, 118 Fauconnier, Gilles 125
criteria 17, 18, 32, 33, 38, 39, 42, 43, Fillmore, Charles 75, 76, 124
Fiorentino, Rosso 116
44, 45, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 66 formal language 41
critical discourse analysis 9, 11, 13, Fowler, Roger 54
frame 30, 31, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 81, 86,
14, 18, 33, 37, 54, 55 87, 109, 112, 123, 124, 125, 126
Curtius, Ernst Robert 32 frame analysis 74
framing 40, 72, 78, 107, 112, 125
D
G
data 14, 32, 34, 48, 49, 58, 62, 85, 96,
102, 108, 110, 127 Garssen 56
gaze 95, 99, 101, 110
David, Jacques-Louis 45, 106, 108, gesture 95, 99, 101
115, 116, 117, 121 Girodet de Roussy-Trioson, Anne-
David’s Marat 108, 116 Louis 116
Deleuze, Gilles 82, 114 Gödel, Kurt 46
De Morgan 44 Goffman, Erving 75, 124
Dijk, Teun 13, 18, 21, 54 Groarke, Leo 69, 70, 75, 76, 78, 84,
discourse 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21,
85, 86, 87, 89, 90, 101, 102, 103, 109,
22, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 54, 55, 70 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119,
discourse fragment 20, 29, 36 120
discourse-historical approach (DHA) Groarke, Louis 116
Grootendorst, Rob 56, 57
13, 14, 15, 19, 26, 29, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37, Guattari, Félix 82, 114
54, 55, 56, 57
doing 29, 38, 80 H
Ducrot, Oswald 81
Halliday, Michael 54
E
Eemeren, Frans H. 56, 57
enchronic analysis 96, 110, 127
Enfield, Nick J. 96, 97, 110
enthymemetic 21
148
